Review Guidelines

Articles submitted will be reviewed and evaluated by the editor first. Articles declared according to the template, the scope has been determined and has a maximum similarity value of 25% by using the turnitin application

This journal uses a double blind review, which means the identity of the reviewer and author is kept secret from the reviewer and vice versa. Below are the components assessed by reviewers.

No

Components

Indicators

1

Title

Effectiveness, Specification and clarity

2

Abstract

The gist of the article

3

Keyword

Article essential concepts

4

Introduction (background, Purpose or scope)

Current issues, originality, relevance of topics, suitability of important reasons for research purposes

5

Literature Review

Conformity between theoretical and empirical topics and studies

6

Method

Accuracy, Specification and clarity

7

Results (Analysis and Synthetic)

Analytical Sharpness

8

Discussion (Interpretation)

Recent findings, relevance to interrelated research, and the influence of scientific contributions from findings / ideas on the development of science.

9

Conclusion

Logical, valid, concise, and clear

10

Suggestion

For practical, new theory development, and further/advanced research

11

 Bibliography

The main references come from journals or scientific research and the latest published books.

Rules: a minimum of 90% of related scientific journals or research, a minimum of 2010.