POLICIES |
---|
Editorial Team |
Peer Reviewers |
Author Guidelines |
Review Guidelines |
Focus and Scope |
Journal History |
Peer Reviewers Process |
Screening for Plagliarism |
Publication Ethics |
Open Access Policy |
Copyright and Lisence |
Author Fee |
Contact Us |
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE |
Make Submission |
TEMPLATE |
TOOLS |
INDEX |
STATISTIK |
LANGUAGE |
Bahasa Indonesia |
English |
INFORMATION |
For Readers |
For Authors |
For Librarians |
PISSN |
EISSN |
Peer Reviewers Process
The research article submitted to this online journal will be double blind review at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process.
Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.
From a publisher’s perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands.
Running articles through the process of peer review adds value to them. For this reason publishers need to make sure that peer review is robust. The decision of publication will be made by the Editor in Chief.